Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from Clinical and Translational Allergy and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research

Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase expression in patients with allergic rhinitis: a case-control study

Annika Luukkainen1, Jussi Karjalainen2, Teemu Honkanen34, Mikko Lehtonen56, Timo Paavonen47 and Sanna Toppila-Salmi89*

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland

2 Allergy Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland

3 Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kanta-Hame Central Hospital, Hameenlinna, Finland

4 Department of Pathology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland

5 Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland

6 Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kanta-Hame Central Hospital, Hameenlinna, Finland

7 Department of Pathology, Centre for Laboratory Medicine, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland

8 Helsinki University Hospital, Skin and Allergy Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

9 Transplantation laboratory, Haartman Institute, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

For all author emails, please log on.

Clinical and Translational Allergy 2011, 1:17  doi:10.1186/2045-7022-1-17

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.ctajournal.com/content/1/1/17


Received:14 November 2011
Accepted:12 December 2011
Published:12 December 2011

© 2011 Luukkainen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background

Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) is a tryptophan catalyzing enzyme. It has been suggested that it has a role in lower airway allergic inflammations, but its role in allergic rhinitis has not been investigated.

Objective

Our aim was to evaluate the expression of IDO in the nasal mucosa of allergic rhinitis patients allergic to birch pollen during peak exposure to birch pollen allergen and compare it to non-atopic patients.

Methods

IDO expression was immunohistochemically evaluated from nasal specimens obtained in- and off-season from otherwise healthy non-smoking volunteers both allergic to birch pollen (having mild or moderate allergic rhinoconjunctivitis) and non-allergic controls. Results: The IDO expression levels were low in healthy controls and remained low also in patients allergic to birch pollen. There were no differences in the expression of IDO in- and off-season in either healthy or allergic subjects.

Conclusions

There is a controversy in the role of IDO in upper and lower airways during allergic airway disease. It seems that IDO is associated to allergic inflammations of the lower airways, but does not have a local role in the nasal cavity at least in mild or moderate forms of allergic rhinitis.

Keywords:
Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase; allergic rhinitis; birch pollen; dendritic cell; tryptophan; kynurenine; interferon gamma; leukocyte; eosinophil

Introduction

Indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase (IDO) is an intracellular enzyme that initiates the first and rate-limiting step of tryptophan breakdown along the kynurenine pathway [1]. IDO is widely expressed in a variety of cell types including leukocytes and tumour cells [2]. Initially the role of IDO was thought to be mainly antimicrobial by reducing the availability of the essential amino acid tryptophan in the inflammatory environment [3]. In the past years, IDO has emerged as an important regulator of the immune system; however, it is not known whether local IDO activity is beneficial or detrimental to inflamed tissues. IDO is induced by interferon γ (IFN-γ) and other inflammatory cytokines during inflammation or as a consequence of normal tissue function [4]. IDO suppresses T cell activity and promotes T cell tolerance to further antigenic challenges, by promoting the differentiation of naïve CD4 T cells into regulatory T cells, putatively by regulation by dendritic cells [5-10]. IDO seems to serve as a negative feedback loop or is not essential for Th1 responses, but plays a distinct role in up-regulating Th2 dominant immune responses [2,11]. Moreover, IDO has also been shown to down-regulate Th2 responses [12]. The role of IDO in the modulation of allergic airway inflammation has recently been investigated [13-16].

Our objective was to observe IDO expression levels in the nasal mucosa of allergic rhinitis patients allergic to birch pollen in relation to exposure to birch pollen allergen and compare it to healthy controls.

Materials and methods

Subjects

This study is a case-control study. It was carried out at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Tampere University Hospital, Finland and has been approved by the Hospital's Ethical committee. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. The subjects were Caucasian. Patients were either atopic with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms, or non-atopic. Moreover, the patients did not have other diseases such as asthma. The diagnosis of birch pollen-induced allergic rhinitis was based on a history of seasonal allergic rhinitis during spring, clinical examination, and skin prick test positivity. Characteristics of the subject groups are shown in table 1. Specimens were taken from the nasal cavity. Biopsies from the anterior edge of the inferior turbinate were obtained with Fokkens' forceps under local anaesthesia. Specimens were taken during both winter (off season) and during peak allergen exposure in spring (in season, natural allergen exposure). Patients were not allowed to use their medication (antihistamine and/or nasal corticosteroids) for a minimum of 5 days before nasal biopsies were taken.

Table 1. Patient characteristics

Sample staining

Nasal specimens were immediately snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C until analysis. Tissue samples were stained with hemalaun-eosin to calculate the number of mucosal leukocytes and eosinophils/mm2 and to evaluate the inflammation score (0 = no inflammation, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe inflammation) For light microscope evaluation, immunoperoxidase staining was used and specimens were cut into 3-5 μm thick frozen sections on Superfrost Plus microscope slides. (Menzel-Gläser, Braunschweig, Germany). Frozen sections were fixed with formalin during 45 minutes. Fully automated immunostaining was performed by Ventana BenchMark LT Automated IHC Stainer (Ventana Medical System, Arizona, USA). Ultraview Universal DAB detection kit (catalogue No. 760-500, Ventana Medical System, Arizona, USA) was used. For epitope retrieval CC1: Tris -EDTA buffer pH 8.0 (catalogue No 950-124, Ventana) was used at 95°C to 100°C for 8 minutes. Endogenous peroxidase was blocked with UV-Inhibitor 3% H202 (Ventana) for 4 minutes at 37°C. Tissue slides were rinsed between steps with Ventana Tris-based Reaction buffer (catalogue No. 950-300, Ventana). Slides were incubated at 37°C for 32 minutes with mAb anti-Indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase (1:200, clone MAB5412, Chemicon International Inc., USA) followed by application of Ventana Ultraview HRP Universal Multimer (8 minutes at 37°C). Diaminobenzidine (DAB) was used as a chromogen and haematoxylin as a nuclear stain. Known positive tissue samples (from coeliac or inflammatory bowel disease) were also used to confirm the staining reliability of all separate staining patches [17,18]. The specificity of immunohistochemistry was controlled by omitting the primary antibodies or replacing them with irrelevant antisera.

Light microscopic evaluation

Sections were examined with a Leica DM 2000 light microscope (Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) by two independent observers blinded to the experimental conditions. In a sample, there was either moderate or strong immunoreactivity of all epithelial cells or no epithelial positivity at all. Thus, the results were expressed as IDO positive epithelium or IDO negative epithelium. The percentage of IDO positive mucosal leukocytes was counted.

Data analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out by SPSS Base 15.0 Statistical Software Package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Data is expressed as medians or means. For comparisons, the results were analysed by, Fisher's exact (discrete) or Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney U tests (continuous). For pair-wise comparisons McNemar's and Wilcoxon tests were used. Two-tailed P-values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

IDO was expressed in the vicinity of the Golgi apparatus of epithelial cells, but not on the supraepithelial mucus. IDO was additionally expressed weakly in submucosal leukocytes and in intraepithelial glands. When observing the nasal biopsies, the number of specimens having positive epithelial IDO staining was not associated with atopy during either winter or spring (P > 0.05 by Fisher's test, Table 1, Figure 1). The percentage of IDO positive leukocytes did not associate with atopy in specimens taken during either winter or spring (P > 0.05, by Kruskal-Wallis test, Table 2, Figure 1). Nor did it associate with the expression of IDO in the epithelium (P > 0.05, by Kruskal-Wallis test, data not shown). The subjects did not have changes in the epithelial IDO expression or in the percentage of IDO positive leukocytes when comparing specimens taken during winter and spring from the same individuals (P > 0.05, by Wilcoxon test, Table 2). The median number of mucosal eosinophils was significantly higher in atopic than in non-atopic subjects only during symptomatic spring (P = 0.044, by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann Whitney U test, table 2), whereas the percentage of eosinophils did not significantly differ between atopic and non-atopic subjects (P > 0.05, by Kruskal-Wallis test, table 2). Interestingly, during spring the number of mucosal leukocytes and the percentage of IDO positive leukocytes correlated significantly (P < 0.05, r = 0.46, by Spearman rank correlation test, data not shown).

thumbnailFigure 1. The expression of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) in biopsies from the nasal cavity. (A) Nasal mucosa taken from a patient with allergic rhinitis off-season (during winter). No epithelial or leukocyte expression of IDO. (B) Specimen from another patient with allergic rhinitis, taken off-season, has epithelial IDO+ and leukocyte IDO-. (C) The same allergic rhinitis patient as in frame A, did not display any IDO expression in the specimen taken in-season (during spring). (D) Specimen from a healthy patient, taken off-season, shows epithelial IDO- and leukocyte IDO+. Original magnification 200× (A, B, D) and 400× (C).

Table 2. Characteristics of nasal specimens

As expected, atopics had significantly increased serum IgE levels (p < 0,001, by Kruskal-Wallis, Mann Whitney U). Atopic subjects had a significantly increased median symptom score during symptomatic spring in comparison to asymptomatic winter (P = 0.031, by Wilcoxon test, table 2), whereas in the non-atopic subjects, the median symptom score in winter and spring did not vary (P > 0.05, by Wilcoxon test, table 2). Accordingly, the median symptom score was significantly higher in the atopic than in the non-atopic group during spring but did not differ during winter (P = 0.003, P > 0.05, respectively, by Fisher's exact test, table 2).

Discussion

We aimed to evaluate IDO expression in two well defined human phenotypes: controls and their atopic counter-parts. Skin prick tests (SPT) were performed on all study subjects to confirm diagnosis. The control and atopic groups did not differ in terms of patient number, age, sex, peripheral blood eosinophils, percentage of peripheral blood eosinophils. (p > 0,05 Kruskal-Wallis, Mann Whitney U) In comparison to controls, atopics had significantly higher serum IgE levels as well as significantly higher IgE levels against allergens to which the subjects were allergic. Atopics and controls differed in their symptom score only during the spring (in season, natural allergen exposure). Surprisingly, there were no differences between inflammation score, leukocyte numbers, percentages of eosinophils, IDO+ in epithelial cells and leucocytes during winter (off season) and spring. Atopics had a higher number of eosinophils during spring only.

We observed that in the nasal cavity, expression of IDO was low and did not differ between atopic and non-atopic groups. Moreover IDO expression did not fluctuate in the same individuals between symptomatic spring and asymptomatic winter season. We have also previously shown that the role of the nasal epithelium in birch pollen atopy is important [19]. In contrast others have shown that IDO might have a role in atopy. Paveglio et al. very recently showed in a transgenic mouse model that over-expression of IDO in the lungs might cause an anti-asthmatic effect by diminishing proliferation, numbers and cytokine production of CD4 + T cells [20]. Others have also previously shown that after in vivo aeroallergen exposure, serum IDO activity was increased in asymptomatic atopics compared with either symptomatic atopic or non-atopic individuals [21]. When exposing in vitro monocyte-derived dendritic cells with house dust mite Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus 1, functionally active IDO decreased in cells from patients with house dust mite-sensitive asthma compared to non-atopic asthmatics [15]. In asthmatic patients, the baseline IDO activity in sputum has been shown to be significantly lower than control levels, but normal baseline activity in asthmatic patients could be induced by using inhaled corticosteroids [22]. We have previously demonstrated that a high expression of epithelial and leukocyte IDO is associated with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, while the expression in chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps remained at the control level [23]. Thus in the upper airways, in contrast to lower airways, it seems that IDO might have a role in the nasal polyp pathomechanisms instead of atopy. Yet, more studies are required to bring evidence on this.

The expression of IDO differs between tissues [24]. Recently, two isoforms of IDO have been studied, IDO1 and IDO2. The expression and activity of both isoform differs in different tissues and in same cell cultures [25]. Both isoforms therefore might differ somehow in their roles [26,27]. Having this in mind, it could be possible that the anti-IDO mAb we used could be specific only for the IDO1 isotope [27]. Also, in some tissues IDO expression does not correlate with its activity. Indeed, elevated expression of IDO can translate into little activity or no activity at all [24]. Even though high levels of IDO expression can be measured, this does not necessarily translate into activity measured by ratio of tryptophan over kynurenine.

Both atopic asthma and atopic rhinitis are complex diseases with different phenotypes and genetic backgrounds. Currently it is thought that patients with certain (epi)genetic elements are prone to have immunological dysfunctions of respiratory barriers putatively by stimulation by certain environmental interactions [28]. Thus, our findings suggest that adult patients with only birch pollen AR but not asthma symptoms do not have local IDO. In the future, it would be of interest to observe whether immunological factors differ in patients having only the AR phenotype compared to those with the AR and asthma phenotype [29].

Conclusions

This study showed that in the nasal cavity, epithelial and leukocyte IDO expression is low and is not associated to allergic rhinitis caused by birch pollen. There is a controversy in the role of IDO in the pathogenesis of atopy, between upper and lower airways. More human studies are warranted to study the role of IDO in more detail in allergic rhinitis and other atopies.

Abbreviations

AR: allergic rhinitis; IDO: Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase; Ig: immunoglobulin; Th1: T-helper cell 1; Th2: T-helper cell 2.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

ST-S designed the study and collected the specimens with ML; TH performed staining. AL, ST-S, TP, and JK evaluated the specimens. AL and ST-S were involved in the data interpretation, literature search and writing. All authors commented critically on the writing. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Eini Eskola, Raija Hukkila, and Marja-Leena Koskinen for excellent technical assistance, and research nurse Marja-Leena Oksanen for excellent collaboration. Last but not least, we thank all the volunteers who participated in the study. This study was supported by research grants from the Ahokas Foundation, the Competitive Research Funds of Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa, and Pirkanmaa Hospital District, the Finnish Anti-Tuberculosis Association, the Finnish Society of Allergology and Immunology, the Finnish Society of Otorhinolaryngology, the Tampere Tuberculosis Foundation, and the Väinö and Laina Kivi Foundation.

References

  1. Moffett JR, Namboodiri MA: Tryptophan and the immune response.

    Immunol Cell Biol 2003, 81:247-65. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  2. Xu H, Oriss TB, Fei M, et al.: Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase in lung dendritic cells promotes Th2 responses and allergic inflammation.

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008, 105:6690-5. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  3. Yoshida R, Urade Y, Tokuda M, Hayaishi O: Induction of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase in mouse lung during virus infection.

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1979, 76:4084-6. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  4. Daubener W, MacKenzie CR: IFN-gamma activated indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase activity in human cells is an antiparasitic and an antibacterial effector mechanism.

    Adv Exp Med Biol 1999, 467:517-24. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  5. von Bubnoff D, Hanau D, Wenzel J, Takikawa O, Hall B, Koch S, Bieber T: Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-expressing antigen-presenting cells and peripheral T-cell tolerance: another piece to the atopic puzzle?

    J Allergy Clin Immunol 2003, 112:854-60. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  6. van der Marel AP, Samsom JN, Greuter M, van Berkel LA, O'Toole T, Kraal G, Mebius RE: Blockade of IDO inhibits nasal tolerance induction.

    J Immunol 2007, 179:894-900. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  7. Chen W, Liang X, Peterson AJ, Munn DH, Blazar BR: The indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase pathway is essential for human plasmacytoid dendritic cell-induced adaptive T regulatory cell generation.

    J Immunol 2008, 181:5396-404. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  8. Taher YA, Piavaux BJ, Gras R, et al.: Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-dependent tryptophan metabolites contribute to tolerance induction during allergen immunotherapy in a mouse model.

    J Allergy Clin Immunol 2008, 121:983.

    91.e2

    PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  9. Brenk M, Scheler M, Koch S, et al.: Tryptophan deprivation induces inhibitory receptors ILT3 and ILT4 on dendritic cells favoring the induction of human CD4+CD25+ Foxp3+ T regulatory cells.

    J Immunol 2009, 183:145-54. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  10. Onodera T, Jang MH, Guo Z, et al.: Constitutive expression of IDO by dendritic cells of mesenteric lymph nodes: functional involvement of the CTLA-4/B7 and CCL22/CCR4 interactions.

    J Immunol 2009, 183:5608-14. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  11. Xu H, Zhang GX, Ciric B, Rostami A: IDO: a double-edged sword for T(H)1/T(H)2 regulation.

    Immunol Lett 2008, 121:1-6. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  12. Grohmann U, Volpi C, Fallarino F, et al.: Reverse signaling through GITR ligand enables dexamethasone to activate IDO in allergy.

    Nat Med 2007, 13:579-86. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  13. Hayashi T, Beck L, Rossetto C, et al.: Inhibition of experimental asthma by indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase.

    J Clin Invest 2004, 114:270-9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  14. Gordon JR, Li F, Nayyar A, Xiang J, Zhang X: CD8 alpha+, but not CD8 alpha-, dendritic cells tolerize Th2 responses via contact-dependent and -independent mechanisms, and reverse airway hyperresponsiveness, Th2, and eosinophil responses in a mouse model of asthma.

    J Immunol 2005, 175:1516-22. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  15. Maneechotesuwan K, Wamanuttajinda V, Kasetsinsombat K, Huabprasert S, Yaikwawong M, Barnes PJ, Wongkajornsilp A: Der p 1 suppresses indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase in dendritic cells from house dust mite-sensitive patients with asthma.

    J Allergy Clin Immunol 2009, 123:239-48. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  16. Forsythe P, Inman MD, Bienenstock J: Oral treatment with live Lactobacillus reuteri inhibits the allergic airway response in mice.

    Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007, 175:561-9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  17. Wolf AM, Wolf D, Rumpold H, et al.: Overexpression of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase in human inflammatory bowel disease.

    Clin Immunol 2004, 113:47-55. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  18. Torres MI, Lopez-Casado MA, Lorite P, Rios A: Tryptophan metabolism and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase expression in coeliac disease.

    Clin Exp Immunol 2007, 148:419-24. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  19. Joenvaara S, Mattila P, Renkonen J, et al.: Caveolar transport through nasal epithelium of birch pollen allergen Bet v 1 in allergic patients.

    J Allergy Clin Immunol 2009, 124:135.

    142.e1-21

    PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  20. Paveglio SA, Allard J, Foster Hodgkins SR, et al.: Airway epithelial indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase inhibits CD4+ T cells during Aspergillus fumigatus antigen exposure.

    Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2011, 44:11-23. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  21. von Bubnoff D, Fimmers R, Bogdanow M, Matz H, Koch S, Bieber T: Asymptomatic atopy is associated with increased indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase activity and interleukin-10 production during seasonal allergen exposure.

    Clin Exp Allergy 2004, 34:1056-63. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  22. Maneechotesuwan K, Supawita S, Kasetsinsombat K, Wongkajornsilp A, Barnes PJ: Sputum indoleamine-2, 3-dioxygenase activity is increased in asthmatic airways by using inhaled corticosteroids.

    J Allergy Clin Immunol 2008, 121:43-50. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  23. Araujo E, Palombini BC, Cantarelli V, Pereira A, Mariante A: Microbiology of middle meatus in chronic rhinosinusitis.

    Am J Rhinol 2003, 17:9-15. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  24. Dai X, Zhu BT: Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase tissue distribution and cellular localization in mice: implications for its biological functions.

    J Histochem Cytochem 2010, 58:17-28. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  25. Ball HJ, Sanchez-Perez A, Weiser S, et al.: Characterization of an indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-like protein found in humans and mice.

    Gene 2007, 396:203-13. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  26. Metz R, Duhadaway JB, Kamasani U, Laury-Kleintop L, Muller AJ, Prendergast GC: Novel tryptophan catabolic enzyme IDO2 is the preferred biochemical target of the antitumor indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase inhibitory compound D-1-methyl-tryptophan.

    Cancer Res 2007, 67:7082-7. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  27. Lob S, Konigsrainer A, Zieker D, Brucher BL, Rammensee HG, Opelz G, Terness P: IDO1 and IDO2 are expressed in human tumors: levo- but not dextro-1-methyl tryptophan inhibits tryptophan catabolism.

    Cancer Immunol Immunother 2009, 58:153-7. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  28. Busse WW: The role of allergy in disease.

    Immunol Rev 2011, 242:5-9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  29. An XJ, Bai CX, Xia JB, Dang T, Qian P, Qian GS, Liao W: Immature dendritic cells expressing indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase suppress ovalbumin-induced allergic airway inflammation in mice.

    J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2011, 21:185-92. PubMed Abstract OpenURL