<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.ctajournal.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Clinical and Translational Allergy - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.ctajournal.com</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by Clinical and Translational Allergy</description>
        <dc:date>2012-04-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ctajournal.com/content/2/1/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ctajournal.com/content/2/1/8" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ctajournal.com/content/2/1/5" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ctajournal.com/content/1/1/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ctajournal.com/content/1/1/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ctajournal.com/content/1/1/18" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ctajournal.com/content/1/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ctajournal.com/content/1/1/9" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ctajournal.com/content/2/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ctajournal.com/content/2/1/6" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.ctajournal.com/content/2/1/2">
        <title>Mechanisms of allergen-specific immunotherapy</title>
        <description>Allergen-specific immunotherapy (allergen-SIT) is a potentially curative treatment approach in allergic diseases. It has been used for almost 100 years as a desensitizing therapy. The induction of peripheral T cell tolerance and promotion of the formation of regulatory T-cells are key mechanisms in allergen-SIT. Both FOXP3+CD4+CD25+ regulatory T (Treg) cells and inducible IL-10- and TGF-&#946;-producing type 1 Treg (Tr1) cells may prevent the development of allergic diseases and play a role in successful allergen-SIT and healthy immune response via several mechanisms. The mechanisms of suppression of different pro-inflammatory cells, such as eosinophils, mast cells and basophils and the development of allergen tolerance also directly or indirectly involves Treg cells. Furthermore, the formation of non-inflammatory antibodies particularly IgG4 is induced by IL-10. Knowledge of these molecular basis is crucial in the understanding the regulation of immune responses and their possible therapeutic targets in allergic diseases.</description>
        <link>http://www.ctajournal.com/content/2/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Hiroyuki Fujita</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michael Soyka</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mubeccel Akdis</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Cezmi Akdis</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Clinical and Translational Allergy 2012, null:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2045-7022-2-2</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2045-7022-2-2-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Clinical and Translational Allergy</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2045-7022</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-05T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.ctajournal.com/content/2/1/8">
        <title>Allergen-specific immunotherapy provides immediate, long-term and preventive clinical effects in children and adults: the effects of immunotherapy can be categorised by level of benefit -the centenary of allergen specific subcutaneous immunotherapy</title>
        <description>Allergen Specific Immunotherapy (SIT) for respiratory allergic diseases is able to significantly improve symptoms as well as reduce the need for symptomatic medication, but SIT also has the capacity for long-term clinical effects and plays a protective role against the development of further allergies and symptoms. The treatment acts on basic immunological mechanisms, and has the potential to change the pathological allergic immune response. In this paper we discuss some of the most important achievements in the documentation of the benefits of immunotherapy, over the last 2 decades, which have marked a period of extensive research on the clinical effects and immunological background of the mechanisms involved. The outcome of immunotherapy is described as different levels of benefit from early reduction in symptoms over progressive clinical effects during treatment to long-term effects after discontinuation of the treatment and prevention of asthma. The efficacy of SIT increases the longer it is continued and immunological changes lead to potential long-term benefits. SIT alone and not the symptomatic treatment nor other avoidance measures has so far been documented as the therapy with long-term or preventive potential. The allergic condition is driven by a subset of T-helper lymphocytes (Th2), which are characterised by the production of cytokines like IL-4, and IL-5. Immunological changes following SIT lead to potential curative effects. One mechanism whereby immunotherapy suppresses the allergic response is through increased production of IgG4 antibodies. Induction of specific IgG4 is able to influence the allergic response in different ways and is related to immunological effector mechanisms, also responsible for the reduced late phase hyperreactivity and ongoing allergic inflammation. SIT is the only treatment which interferes with the basic pathophysiological mechanisms of the allergic disease, thereby creating the potential for changes in the long-term prognosis of respiratory allergy. SIT should not only be recognised as first-line therapeutic treatment for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis but also as secondary preventive treatment for respiratory allergic diseases.</description>
        <link>http://www.ctajournal.com/content/2/1/8</link>
                <dc:creator>Lars Jacobsen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ulrich Wahn</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Beatrice Bilo</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Clinical and Translational Allergy 2012, null:8</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-04-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2045-7022-2-8</dc:identifier>
                            <dc:title>Is allergen-SIT the only long-term solution?</dc:title>
                            <dc:description>Jacobsen et al look back at some explorative and confirmatory studies on allergen-specific immunotherapy over the last 10-20 years, which as the only treatment to interfere with the basic pathophysiological mechanisms may hold the key to long-term improved prognosis.</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/2045-7022-2-8-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Clinical and Translational Allergy</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2045-7022</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-13T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.ctajournal.com/content/2/1/5">
        <title>FAST: Towards safe and effective subcutaneous immunotherapy of persistent life-threatening food allergies</title>
        <description>The FAST project (Food Allergy Specific Immunotherapy) aims at the development of safe and effective treatment of food allergies, targeting prevalent, persistent and severe allergy to fish and peach. Classical allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT), using subcutaneous injections with aqueous food extracts may be effective but has proven to be accompanied by too many anaphylactic side-effects. FAST aims to develop a safe alternative by replacing food extracts with hypoallergenic recombinant major allergens as the active ingredients of SIT. Both severe fish and peach allergy are caused by a single major allergen, parvalbumin (Cyp c 1) and lipid transfer protein (Pru p 3), respectively. Two approaches are being evaluated for achieving hypoallergenicity, i.e. site-directed mutagenesis and chemical modification. The most promising hypoallergens will be produced under GMP conditions. After pre-clinical testing (toxicology testing and efficacy in mouse models), SCIT with alum-absorbed hypoallergens will be evaluated in phase I/IIa and IIb randomized double-blind placebo-controlled (DBPC) clinical trials, with the DBPC food challenge as primary read-out. To understand the underlying immune mechanisms in depth serological and cellular immune analyses will be performed, allowing identification of novel biomarkers for monitoring treatment efficacy. FAST aims at improving the quality of life of food allergic patients by providing a safe and effective treatment that will significantly lower their threshold for fish or peach intake, thereby decreasing their anxiety and dependence on rescue medication.</description>
        <link>http://www.ctajournal.com/content/2/1/5</link>
                <dc:creator>Laurian Zuidmeer-Jongejan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Montserrat Fernandez-Rivas</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lars Poulsen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Angela Neubauer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Juan Asturias</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lars Blom</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joyce Boye</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carsten Bindslev-Jensen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michael Clausen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rosa Ferrara</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Paula Garosi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hans Huber</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bettina Jensen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Stef Koppelman</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marek Kowalski</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anna Lewandowska-Polak</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Birgit Linhart</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bernard Maillere</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Adriano Mari</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alberto Martinez</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Clare Mills</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Claudio Nicoletti</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dirk-Jan Opstelten</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nikos Papadopoulos</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Antonio Portoles</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Neil Rigby</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Enrico Scala</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Heidi Schnoor</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sigurveig Sigursdottir</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Georg Stavroulakis</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Frank Stolz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ines Swoboda</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rudolf Valenta</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rob van den Hout</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Serge Versteeg</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marianne Witten</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ronald van Ree</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Clinical and Translational Allergy 2012, null:5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-03-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2045-7022-2-5</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2045-7022-2-5-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Clinical and Translational Allergy</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2045-7022</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-03-09T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.ctajournal.com/content/1/1/2">
        <title>Diagnostic Tools In Rhinology
EAACI position paper
</title>
        <description>This EAACI Task Force document aims at providing the readers with a comprehensive and complete overview of the currently available tools for diagnosis of nasal and sino-nasal disease. We have tried to logically order the different important issues related to history taking, clinical examination and additional investigative tools for evaluation of the severity of sinonasal disease into a consensus document. A panel of European experts in the field of Rhinology has contributed to this consensus document on Diagnostic Tools in Rhinology.</description>
        <link>http://www.ctajournal.com/content/1/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Glenis Scadding</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Peter Hellings</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Isam Alobid</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Claus Bachert</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Wytske Fokkens</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Roy Gerth van Wijk</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Philippe Gevaert</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Josep Guilemany</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Livije Kalogjera</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Valerie Lund</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joaquim Mullol</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Giovanni Passalacqua</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Elina Toskala</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Cornelius van Drunen</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Clinical and Translational Allergy 2011, null:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-06-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2045-7022-1-2</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2045-7022-1-2-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Clinical and Translational Allergy</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2045-7022</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-06-10T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.ctajournal.com/content/1/1/4">
        <title>Impact of Aspergillus fumigatus in Allergic Airway Diseases</title>
        <description>For decades, fungi have been recognized as associated with asthma and other reactive airway diseases. In contrast to type I-mediated allergies caused by pollen, fungi cause a large number of allergic diseases such as allergic bronchopulmonary mycoses, rhinitis, allergic sinusitis and hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Amongst the fungi, Aspergillus fumigatus is the most prevalent cause of severe pulmonary allergic disease, including allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA), known to be associated with chronic lung injury and deterioration in pulmonary function in people with chronic asthma and cystic fibrosis (CF). The goal of this review is to discuss new understandings of host-pathogen interactions in the genesis of allergic airway diseases caused by A. fumigatus. Host and pathogen related factors that participate in triggering the inflammatory cycle leading to pulmonary exacerbations in ABPA are discussed.</description>
        <link>http://www.ctajournal.com/content/1/1/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Neelkamal Chaudhary</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kieren Marr</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Clinical and Translational Allergy 2011, null:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-06-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2045-7022-1-4</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2045-7022-1-4-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Clinical and Translational Allergy</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2045-7022</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-06-10T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.ctajournal.com/content/1/1/18">
        <title>Difference in symptom severity between early and late grass pollen season in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis </title>
        <description>Background:
For the development of forecasts for seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms, it is essential to understand the relationship between grass pollen concentrations and the symptoms of grass pollen allergic patients.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to delineate this relationship between seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms and grass pollen concentrations in the Netherlands.
Methods:
Grass pollen allergic patients (n = 80 [2007] - 84 [2008]) were enrolled into the study. They were asked to enter their seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms (runny nose, sneezing, blocked nose, post nasal drip, and eye symptoms) daily on a scale from 0 to 3 to the study centre either by short message service (SMS) or by internet from May-July 2007 and April-July 2008. Daily pollen counts were used to define the early and the late grass pollen season as the period &apos;before and during&apos; respectively &apos;after&apos; the first grass pollen peak (more than 150 pollen/m3).
Results:
At similar grass pollen concentrations, the daily mean of the individual maximum symptom scores reported in the early season were higher as compared to that reported in the late season [differences of -0.41 (2007) and -0.30 (2008)]. This difference could not be explained by medication use by the patients nor by co-sensitization to birch.
Conclusions:
We conclude that seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms at similar grass pollen concentrations are more severe in the early flowering season as compared to those in the late flowering season. This finding is not only relevant for development of forecasts for seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms but also for understanding symptom development and planning and analysis of clinical studies.</description>
        <link>http://www.ctajournal.com/content/1/1/18</link>
                <dc:creator>Letty de Weger</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Thijs Beerthuizen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jeannette Gast-Strookman</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dirk van der Plas</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ingrid Terreehorst</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Pieter Hiemstra</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jacob Sont</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Clinical and Translational Allergy 2011, null:18</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-12-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2045-7022-1-18</dc:identifier>
                            <dc:title>Hay fever symptoms worst during spring</dc:title>
                            <dc:description>Hay fever sufferers report more severe symptoms during early pollen season compared to late season, despite similar pollen count levels. This variation is not accounted for by differences in medication or other concurrent allergies.</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/2045-7022-1-18-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Clinical and Translational Allergy</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2045-7022</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>18</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-12-21T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.ctajournal.com/content/1/1/3">
        <title>Not all shellfish &amp;quot;allergy&amp;quot; is allergy!</title>
        <description>The popularity of shellfish has been increasing worldwide, with a consequent increase in adverse reactions that can be allergic or toxic. The approximate prevalence of shellfish allergy is estimated at 0.5-2.5% of the general population, depending on degree of consumption by age and geographic regions. The manifestations of shellfish allergy vary widely, but it tends to be more severe than most other food allergens.Tropomyosin is the major allergen and is responsible for cross-reactivity between members of the shellfish family, particularly among the crustacea. Newly described allergens and subtle differences in the structures of tropomyosin between different species of shellfish could account for the discrepancy between in vitro cross-antigenicity and clinical cross-allergenicity. The diagnosis requires a thorough medical history supported by skin testing or measurement of specific IgE level, and confirmed by appropriate oral challenge testing unless the reaction was life-threatening.Management of shellfish allergy is basically strict elimination, which in highly allergic subjects may include avoidance of touching or smelling and the availability of self-administered epinephrine. Specific immunotherapy is not currently available and requires the development of safe and effective protocols.</description>
        <link>http://www.ctajournal.com/content/1/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Chee Woo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sami Bahna</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Clinical and Translational Allergy 2011, null:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-06-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2045-7022-1-3</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2045-7022-1-3-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Clinical and Translational Allergy</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2045-7022</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-06-10T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.ctajournal.com/content/1/1/9">
        <title>Vitamin C and asthma in children: modification of the effect by age, exposure to dampness and the severity of asthma</title>
        <description>Background:
We previously found a significant benefit of vitamin C supplementation in asthmatic children.PurposeTo test whether the effect of vitamin C on asthma is heterogeneous over the participant population.
Methods:
Egyptian asthmatic children between 7 and 10 years of age (n = 60) were included in the cross-over trial. They were administered 0.2 grams per day of vitamin C and placebo for separate 6-week periods. The variation in the vitamin C effect on two clinically relevant outcomes was analyzed: the childhood asthma control test (C-ACT), which measures the severity of asthma symptoms (the scale ranges from 0 to 27 points, &lt; 20 points indicating unsatisfactory asthma control), and FEV1. We used linear modeling to examine the variation of the vitamin C effect in the subgroups.
Results:
The effect of vitamin C on the C-ACT was significantly modified by age and baseline C-ACT levels. In the children aged 7.0-8.2 years with a baseline C-ACT of 18 to 19 points, vitamin C increased the C-ACT score by 4.2 points (95% CI: 3.3-5.3); whereas in the children aged 8.3-10 years who had a baseline C-ACT of 14 to 15 points, vitamin C increased the C-ACT score by only 1.3 points (95% CI: 0.1-2.5). The effect of vitamin C on the FEV1 levels was significantly modified by age and exposure to dampness. In the children aged 7.0-8.2 years with no exposure to dampness, vitamin C increased the FEV1 level by 37% (95% CI: 34-40%), whereas in the children aged 8.3-10 years with exposure to dampness or mold in their bedroom more than one year prior to the study, vitamin C increased the FEV1 level by only 21% (95% CI: 18-25%).
Conclusions:
We found strong evidence that the effect of vitamin C on asthmatic children is heterogeneous. Further research is needed to confirm our findings and identify the groups of children who would receive the greatest benefit from vitamin C supplementation.</description>
        <link>http://www.ctajournal.com/content/1/1/9</link>
                <dc:creator>Harri Hemila</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mohammed Al-Biltagi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ahmed Baset</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Clinical and Translational Allergy 2011, null:9</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-08-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2045-7022-1-9</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2045-7022-1-9-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Clinical and Translational Allergy</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2045-7022</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-08-25T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.ctajournal.com/content/2/1/3">
        <title>What factors affect the carriage of epinephrine auto-injectors by teenagers?</title>
        <description>Background:
Teenagers with allergies are at particular risk of severe and fatal reactions, but epinephrine auto-injectors are not always carried as prescribed. We investigated barriers to carriage.
Methods:
Patients aged 12-18 years old under a specialist allergy clinic, who had previously been prescribed an auto-injector were invited to participate. Semi-structured interviews explored the factors that positively or negatively impacted on carriage.
Results:
Twenty teenagers with food or venom allergies were interviewed. Only two patients had used their auto-injector in the community, although several had been treated for severe reactions in hospital. Most teenagers made complex risk assessments to determine whether to carry the auto-injector. Most but not all decisions were rational and were at least partially informed by knowledge. Factors affecting carriage included location, who else would be present, the attitudes of others and physical features of the auto-injector. Teenagers made frequent risk assessments when deciding whether to carry their auto-injectors, and generally wanted to remain safe. Their decisions were complex, multi-faceted and highly individualised.
Conclusions:
Rather than aiming for 100% carriage of auto-injectors, which remains an ambitious ideal, personalised education packages should aim to empower teenagers to make and act upon informed risk assessments.</description>
        <link>http://www.ctajournal.com/content/2/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Clare Macadam</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Julie Barnett</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Graham Roberts</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gary Stiefel</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rosemary King</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michel Erlewyn-Lajeunesse</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Judith Holloway</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jane Lucas</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Clinical and Translational Allergy 2012, null:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-02-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2045-7022-2-3</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2045-7022-2-3-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Clinical and Translational Allergy</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2045-7022</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-02-02T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.ctajournal.com/content/2/1/6">
        <title>Retraction: Vitamin C and asthma in children: modification of the effect by age, exposure to dampness and the severity of asthma</title>
        <description>We reported that the effect of vitamin C on asthma in Egyptian children was modified by age, exposure to dampness and the severity of asthma, Clinical &amp; Translational Allergy 2011, 1:9. After our paper was published, we found out severe problems in the data set. There were 60 children in the study. The ages were by accident duplicated between the upper and lower halves of the database. Thus, the ages for the first 30 children in the data set were identical and in the same order with the ages for the second set of 30 children. Similar duplication was also found for C-ACT and FEV1 measurements after vitamin C supplementation and for exposure to dampness. This duplication thus directly invalidates the second part of the data set, and thus the reported outcome. We have not been able to sort out the reason for this duplication. The files with the original data are not available any more, making it impossible to reconstruct a valid data set for reanalysis. Therefore we have to retract our paper. The authors deeply regret the inconvenience this has caused to the journal and the scientific community.</description>
        <link>http://www.ctajournal.com/content/2/1/6</link>
                <dc:creator>Harri Hemila</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mohammed Al-Biltagi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ahmed Baset</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Clinical and Translational Allergy 2012, null:6</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-03-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2045-7022-2-6</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2045-7022-2-6-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Clinical and Translational Allergy</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2045-7022</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-03-16T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>

